Brawler Charm

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

Getting Started

Rules

Character Mover

Optimization Guide

EZ Wiki

EZ Guide

Magelo

Zone List

Spell Recipes

T10.5 Spell Recipes

Crafting Recipes

Donate

EZ Player Discord

[EZ Server Files]

EZ Server Files

EZ Client Downloads

Custom UF MiniMap

Custom UF Inventory

EQEmu Server Status

EQEmulator Home

Allakhazam Home

UFMissingFilesList

TwitchTV

[Bludlust]

Ok so I have heard 3 different things about how it doesn't work, A: Just the +% doesn't work, B: The stats don't work and C: Just the haste doesn't work....Anyone can clarify EXACTLY whats wrong with the charm? and how long it hasnt been working...would be nice to put one on my ranger and monk and have it work.

[Drezden]

 During our DPS parses we noticed this.. Check out lerxst2112 post at bottom,maybe thats the cause?

http://ezserver.online/forums/index.php?topic=1150.15

Ok, I investigated this a bit on my private server.  Worn haste over 127% will not work.

Here is the relevant code:

bonuses.cpp - line 293

Code:

	//FatherNitwit: New style haste, shields, and regens
	if(newbon->haste < (sint8)item->Haste) {
		newbon->haste = item->Haste;
	}

Since the haste value is a signed 8 bit number, anything over 127 is a negative number and will not be applied.

I checked this file back to June 2009, and it has always been that way.  I would assume that if it ever worked it was due to custom code that is different from the eqemu sources.

Haste is also hardcoded to be capped at 100% for the sum of item haste, spell haste, and spell haste v2.  Spell haste v3 is added on top of that.  Allowing haste past 100%, excluding haste v3, would need to be done with custom code.

[Hunter]

Good info. The haste was working when I originally made the items but obviously got broken with new source code, errr fixed with cap or something.

Looks like I might have to fix Brawlers by making all items with Haste greater than 126 to equal 126 and give some bonuses in other ways like strikethru or something. I'll update that stuff when I can.

[Bludlust]

Sweet bud, would rock

[krujo81]

i dont know if we have this spell in our db/spell files
http://lucy.allakhazam.com/spell.html?id=6207&source=Live
But seems like this would be a good way to go can make varations of it for brawlers 1-50
like brawlers level 1 only add 10% quarter way though 40% then 80% then last one stays at 80% but gives Higher strikethough and +archry hand to hand and backstab

[sohami]

there we go.

hell, make it a proc even or a right click buff.

[Xiggie | Stone]

Giving the brawlers haste up until 125% and then compensating the rest with a proc that gradually goes up I think would be a grand idea. Nothing major, just something that would equal out to the same amount of dps. Adding that to the ultimate charm would seem fair since the UC would lose the haste as well.

[lerxst2112]

If you do make it 125% and expect to actually get 125% out of it then the haste cap will need to be changed if it hasn't already been changed.

To do that you can make a simple edit to client_mods.cpp

Code:

int Client::CalcHaste() {
	int h = spellbonuses.haste + spellbonuses.hastetype2 + itembonuses.haste;
	int cap = 0;
	int level = GetLevel();
	/*
	if(disc_inuse == discBlindingSpeed) {
		if(!disc_elapse.Check(false)) {
			h += 20;		//this ammount is completely unknown
		} else {
			disc_inuse = discNone;
		}
	} */

	if(level < 30) { // Rogean: Are these caps correct? Will use for now.
		cap = 50;
	} else if(level < 50) {
		cap = 74;
	} else if(level < 55) {
		cap = 84;
	} else if(level < 60) {
		cap = 94;
	} else {
		cap = 100; // <- Change to new cap
	}
	

	if(h > cap) h = cap;

	h += spellbonuses.hastetype3;
	h += ExtraHaste;	//GM granted haste.
	
	Haste = h;
	return(Haste); 
}

I increased the cap on my server to 130% and in my brief tests I didn't notice any issues.  This would increase the cap for everyone though, not just those using the brawler charm.  To do that would be more complicated.

[Gnaughty]

You guys are too damned smart for me to follow.

[Drezden]

 Not me lol.. I just try to facilitate the process and bring it to light.

[Balthor2]

If you do make it 125% and expect to actually get 125% out of it then the haste cap will need to be changed if it hasn't already been changed.

To do that you can make a simple edit to client_mods.cpp

Code:

int Client::CalcHaste() {
	int h = spellbonuses.haste + spellbonuses.hastetype2 + itembonuses.haste;
	int cap = 0;
	int level = GetLevel();
	/*
	if(disc_inuse == discBlindingSpeed) {
		if(!disc_elapse.Check(false)) {
			h += 20;		//this ammount is completely unknown
		} else {
			disc_inuse = discNone;
		}
	} */

	if(level < 30) { // Rogean: Are these caps correct? Will use for now.
		cap = 50;
	} else if(level < 50) {
		cap = 74;
	} else if(level < 55) {
		cap = 84;
	} else if(level < 60) {
		cap = 94;
	} else {
		cap = 100; // <- Change to new cap
	}
	

	if(h > cap) h = cap;

	h += spellbonuses.hastetype3;
	h += ExtraHaste;	//GM granted haste.
	
	Haste = h;
	return(Haste); 
}

I increased the cap on my server to 130% and in my brief tests I didn't notice any issues.  This would increase the cap for everyone though, not just those using the brawler charm.  To do that would be more complicated.

If you used this then you would just need to adjust a couple haste values.

Btw hunter you care to let us know what the max value is for stuff like shielding?

[Xiggie | Stone]

If you do make it 125% and expect to actually get 125% out of it then the haste cap will need to be changed if it hasn't already been changed.

To do that you can make a simple edit to client_mods.cpp

Code:

int Client::CalcHaste() {
	int h = spellbonuses.haste + spellbonuses.hastetype2 + itembonuses.haste;
	int cap = 0;
	int level = GetLevel();
	/*
	if(disc_inuse == discBlindingSpeed) {
		if(!disc_elapse.Check(false)) {
			h += 20;		//this ammount is completely unknown
		} else {
			disc_inuse = discNone;
		}
	} */

	if(level < 30) { // Rogean: Are these caps correct? Will use for now.
		cap = 50;
	} else if(level < 50) {
		cap = 74;
	} else if(level < 55) {
		cap = 84;
	} else if(level < 60) {
		cap = 94;
	} else {
		cap = 100; // <- Change to new cap
	}
	

	if(h > cap) h = cap;

	h += spellbonuses.hastetype3;
	h += ExtraHaste;	//GM granted haste.
	
	Haste = h;
	return(Haste); 
}

I increased the cap on my server to 130% and in my brief tests I didn't notice any issues.  This would increase the cap for everyone though, not just those using the brawler charm.  To do that would be more complicated.

If its just a matter of doing this then can't he just set the haste cap at 500% or something like that? That way things that are supposed to be higher than 125% can be so.

[lerxst2112]

The haste cap could be set to anything, however there is a minimum delay that can be used on attacks, so eventually more haste is meaningless.  Going from the current assumption of 100% being the cap, changing it to 500% would also presumably cause balance issues.

[krujo81]

yeah and with weapons having 140 damage 13 dly lol how much haste do u really need?. but on the other hand + to skills would allow you to land hits more offten or +damage (skilL) could let anything in that skill do more damage

[Xiggie | Stone]

When the haste on the brawlers got messed up I lost about 30% dps. That is huge so it does matter quite a bit. I don't see how setting the haste cap to 500% or even 1000% would make any balancing problems. Things would function as they were intended to.

Advanced search

• Official Guild Creation R... by Tylperion [September 15, 2024, 11:54:54 am]
• Broken Stuff Repair Shop ... by Denzig [September 10, 2024, 08:25:02 am]
• T11 Feedback Thread by Sarthin [August 28, 2024, 12:45:01 pm]
• What's next for the rest ... by Mixlor [August 27, 2024, 02:01:07 pm]
• Hard Mode NPC by Mixlor [August 06, 2024, 09:37:00 am]
• Looking for some advice (... by Draca [July 31, 2024, 10:55:17 am]
• 4th of July Event by orkiho [July 12, 2024, 07:35:22 pm]
• New Server update causing... by Mixlor [June 02, 2024, 01:01:54 am]
• Memorial Day Event by wachna [May 30, 2024, 01:52:28 pm]
• EZServer Rules by Sarthin [May 30, 2024, 01:10:12 pm]
• Fear Itself, testing week... by torotornot [May 24, 2024, 09:29:42 am]
• Fear Itself, the new Even... by kendiian [April 26, 2024, 11:48:38 pm]
• Recent & Upcoming Changes by Dokplayer2 [April 23, 2024, 10:48:30 pm]
• Issue with my epic by fangzy [April 22, 2024, 07:32:32 pm]
• Few Changes - T11, VP, Gu... by clbreastmilk [April 10, 2024, 11:32:33 am]
• Combine HoH tokens macro.... by Dbeast [April 04, 2024, 05:10:46 pm]
• Warlock self buffs by Fecs [April 04, 2024, 03:56:08 pm]
• T10 Sunderock quest track... by Marcone [March 12, 2024, 07:12:11 am]
• It makes me very happy to... by Sarthin [March 10, 2024, 08:18:12 am]
• World loot currently brok... by Sarthin [March 08, 2024, 12:36:31 am]
• Testing Help Needed - Tes... by Sarthin [February 28, 2024, 09:49:51 am]
• Tier 11 - Kael Drakkel by Sarthin [February 25, 2024, 09:11:15 am]
• Set filters macro by Marcone [February 23, 2024, 05:13:59 pm]
• TOFS and possible spell b... by AreFitz [February 20, 2024, 02:31:05 pm]
• At Long Last....Tier 11. by Draca [February 16, 2024, 09:30:46 pm]

Members

• Total Members: 6149
• Latest: Acaelis

Stats

• Total Posts: 65081
• Total Topics: 5061
• Online Today: 318
• Online Ever: 8678
• (December 19, 2022, 02:32:09 pm)

Users Online

Users: 0
Guests: 248
Total: 248