|
trendkiller
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: August 10, 2010, 11:45:19 am » |
|
bumpity bump baby.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
<insert lame excuse to try to be original here>
|
|
|
brakkin
Newbie
Posts: 23
|
|
« Reply #16 on: August 10, 2010, 02:33:34 pm » |
|
Do I like have permision to talk here now tht im 3.0? lol.
Hunter Iwouldnt mind if you just screwed the whole AoE dot in favor of something completely different (and usable) such as a worn buff or lifetap increase.
Just my 2 cp
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Laaros-3.0 tacvi/T1 SK
Kendral-2.0 Mage
Brakkin-1.5 Cleric
Teir-1.5 Rogue
|
|
|
|
gimpy
|
|
« Reply #17 on: August 10, 2010, 02:46:07 pm » |
|
I would rather have the aggro clicky put back until something better is worked out
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sohami
|
|
« Reply #18 on: August 10, 2010, 02:51:06 pm » |
|
A aoe dmg (albeit very resistable, and not much damage) is better imo than click aoe aggro. Being that is IS aoe aggro already, and does a little dmg.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brakkin
Newbie
Posts: 23
|
|
« Reply #19 on: August 10, 2010, 03:00:30 pm » |
|
Actually I agree with gimpy, but only as long as its like instant or something better than dread gaze, the spell that already works fine. In T1 when my groups tank goes down and mobs move to healers/etc that AoE isnt enough to get aggro back
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Laaros-3.0 tacvi/T1 SK
Kendral-2.0 Mage
Brakkin-1.5 Cleric
Teir-1.5 Rogue
|
|
|
|
gimpy
|
|
« Reply #20 on: August 10, 2010, 03:18:01 pm » |
|
The SK 3.0 used to have an instant anger clicky, 200 range, just like the warriors epic does. It was great for pulling or getting aggro because it was instant cast.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brakkin
Newbie
Posts: 23
|
|
« Reply #21 on: August 10, 2010, 03:27:47 pm » |
|
Exactly what I think it should be. How bout getting a poll up?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Laaros-3.0 tacvi/T1 SK
Kendral-2.0 Mage
Brakkin-1.5 Cleric
Teir-1.5 Rogue
|
|
|
|
trendkiller
|
|
« Reply #22 on: August 10, 2010, 03:50:47 pm » |
|
Too many agreed that the old click hate was not on par balance wise...with its other counterparts or classes. So even putting that back on is a regressive move.
The dot code is pretty damn complex and might take someone with a deep understanding of custom coding experience. This is the problem. The solution for now is just removing the resist counters on it. This would be FAR better than thinking to revert to the old aggro spell.
The SK is meant to be tanking and doing his/her part during the fights to build the aggro, not for a boxxer to just put him in when the tank goes down. I have NEVER had an issue keeping aggro or even pulling aggro from any class, alternating taps and gaze works just fine. I have been fighting from day one to give the SK3.0 the effectiveness that other 3.0's have had given to them (hybrids...i.e.pally) and this rolling dot, while still doing less then intended and getting resisted way too much, is still a welcome upgrade as far as the class is concerned.
I just bumped the thread to give a lil reminder to pop in the SQL and knock off the resistance counters on the spell.
ill even throw in whip cream and a cherry!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
<insert lame excuse to try to be original here>
|
|
|
|
gimpy
|
|
« Reply #23 on: August 11, 2010, 03:09:33 pm » |
|
I would love to have the affect fixed on the SK 3.0 to bring them up to par with the other tanking classes, but until then, it would be more usefull to have the old aggro clicky back. Just my 2 cp  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Relnon
Newbie
Posts: 6
|
|
« Reply #24 on: August 13, 2010, 05:21:56 am » |
|
PBAE Leech Touch DoT imo.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Relnon - Shadowknight
Panteras - Bard
Sethrik - Shaman
|
|
|
|
sohami
|
|
« Reply #25 on: August 13, 2010, 07:12:02 am » |
|
^
THAT.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Smoka
|
|
« Reply #26 on: August 20, 2010, 10:52:00 am » |
|
Secrets is the one that created the spell for the SK 3.0 Proc. I'll see if I can edit the resist later.
3 weeks later. Have you even looked yet or is this still a 'later' deal? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Smoka
|
|
« Reply #27 on: August 29, 2010, 11:08:47 am » |
|
Guess it's too hard to fix this. Hell, I figure if you can recode new NPC's to solve cosmetic problems, you could actually solve half of an issue in one DB cfind/replace. Guess not.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Lexington
|
|
« Reply #28 on: August 29, 2010, 03:07:24 pm » |
|
that or he's doing it all by himself, if you not contributing to the solution, then you're the problem, imho- ppl that QQ like the previous poster need to be raped in game.
=p
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Smoka
|
|
« Reply #29 on: August 29, 2010, 06:47:09 pm » |
|
He's not doing it all by himself.
If he would give me access to the DB, I would be the solution. Since he won't allow me that access, now what?
Oh, and 'QQ'? Seriously? Really? Yeah....uh huh. I remember my first beer.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
