EVERY time someone types in *stargate* or *stargate universe* to apply to my guild they see this posting right under it

If it means enough to you, you can always remake your guild under a different name. I know it is a hassle, but if you don't include "Stargate" in the name nobody will get the two mixed up.

Or, you could just leave it as it is. If they find this thread, they'll find this discussion too. If a person takes the time to search for your name, I'm sure they'll read the thread.

edit- Also, I didn't even know it was possible to log into the same account multiple times at once.

Good to see you on the forums.

It is not possible. You can use the same eqemulator.org account for up to three loginserver (aka everquest) accounts.

Keep each character on a different login, or you can't use them together.

im a war with duel 4.0 and firestrikes

I'd like to see that. 

Anyhow, it sounds like you did the right thing by waiting, then sending him a tell. That was very polite of you, and he should've responded in kind.

On an unrelated note, I was in-game yesterday and saw this guy. What do you think? Offensive or no?

http://www.ezserver.online/magelo/character.php?char=Sodomize
http://www.ezserver.online/magelo/character.php?char=Sodomized
http://www.ezserver.online/magelo/character.php?char=Sodomizer

Inherited accounts?

Warriors as a class are underpowered at best now, and the one purpose they had over paladins matters not if you make a berserker now. I view that as a nerf, if you do not, that is your own opinion.

From Urban Dictionary, nerf means "To make worse or weaken, usually in the context of weakening something in order to balance out a game."

I don't quote it as an authority, but because it represent the general consensus definition. So actually, you're the one redefining it.

But again, I'm not just trying to correct. I'm trying to help you to see that what you need is a more compelling argument. You know what? You're making a compelling argument about paladins being more powerful than warriors, and about the impact of the crafted scepter of time on the abilities of knights. Keep going with that. Those are great arguments, but simply labeling something a nerf gets us nowhere.

Warriors were not nerfed; other classes have been balanced. The rhetoric makes a big difference.

Nothing happened to warriors. They do the same DPS that they did. They tank the same that they did. Now, it would be nice to give their UC to a DPS class to get even more DPS for minimal effort. That is up to Hunter. I would benefit from it as well, but it is laughable to say that warriors were nerfed. If we ask nicely or come up with more compelling arguments maybe he'll do it, but not based on a faulty premise.

And for what you said, he burned several hours on farming charm, we had to choose on which toon we are going to give charm depending of the power he had ... so yea, it was better to put UC on war, pal.

Warriors haven't been nerfed. Paladins have, but will be able to trade their charms. Everything is fine. And if Hunter decides to allow Wars to trade UCs, then great!

Let's all be grateful for what we receive.

As for your English, as a third language it is still better than some others for whom it is their only language. In fact, you probably understand grammar better since you learned French first  I'm not mocking your ability, but giving a tip that a lot of people can use to better communicate.

I'll benefit from being able to transfer charms, and for that I'm grateful. But I think we should see it as a gift from Hunter. We all had the benefit of those charms on an OP class (some more than others, for sure). Let's cut out the whining.

BTW, some people also need to learn to use periods. Commas are fun, but there are other punctuations available! It'll make your posts a lot easier to read.

There are a lot of good points in this thread. Ashar is right-on about the rules, and Curry is right about the general attitude of the server.

That is hilarious

Are you looking for optimal 4box to progress the furthest? Or are you looking for the best use of the characters you have? Or, perhaps there are classes that you enjoy and want to build around?

It is difficult to tell you what it "should" be without knowing your personal goals.

I would personally say WAR, PAL, CLR, RNG will get you far. And I'd work on charms/augs before entering HOH. You'll want to maximize dps since its a bit of a grind. You'll be able to take out the T3 bosses better with a cleric once you get up to that point, but it will be a long fight with 4 any way you organize your group.

I'd also like to see lower level Ninjastrikes combine for a higher level. As it is, I don't know who would make NS1. Sure, I have a lot of qvic essences, but it is like 200k + SLS that I'll never see again.

At least with FS and IS augs, you can use whatever level you can afford and upgrade later. As it is, I do not see any real use for Qvic essences at all. It wouldn't be unbalancing or unfair to allow the combine either, since it is actually more expensive than directly creating the an NS4 or NS5.

As for pricing, I agree - Icestrikes could definitely be lowered.

Finally, A roadmap of changes would be nice for people to plan ahead.

Pet Affinity would be a good addition. By itself it won't do much, but it is a good building block. It would let the shaman group proc buff more useful in certain situations where the little pets (shm/dru) survive.

Then again, with all the extra AA points we have, I support any new AA idea.

Hopefully people will be able to recognize if your posts are valuable and worth reading by their content, and not by your post count. But if you just want to get your post count up, it looks like this thread is off to a great start.

Why can't bard get a better song modifier with 3.5 and 4.0? That is all I am saying.

I agree with you.